Koivu comments on latest language flap

Updated at 6:15 a.m. ET with Hickey column

In the eyes of some in Quebec, Saku Koivu is less than an ideal captain of the Canadiens unless he speaks French. It’s a story that is in the news again, and Koivu was asked about it yesterday after morning practice.
First clip runs 3:38; second clip runs 1:02.

mg_phickey_150x150-1.jpgPat Hickey

The media horde at the Bell Centre was larger than usual Wednesday and that was to be expected the day after Quebec City lawyer Guy Bertrand branded Saku Koivu as a criminal for failing “to respect the right of Quebecers to be served in French.”

In addition to the usual sports media, the gathering attracted the yahoos who couldn’t tell the difference between a hockey puck and a pétanque ball but are ready to attack a man who should be regarded as a national treasure.

I’m on record as saying the Canadiens management dropped the ball when it didn’t encourage Koivu to say a few words in French but Bertrand’s grandstanding trivializes the serious nature of the debate over reasonable accommodation.

Before you given any credence to Bertrand’s ranting, I suggest that you look at the record of the two men involved in some critical areas and ask which one brings more credit on Quebec, which one would rather have as a neighbour.

Consider loyalty:

In an era in which athletes yearn for free agency and the riches which accompany it, Koivu has stuck with the Canadiens for 12 seasons despite the fact he has been criticized for not being French.

Bertrand has been a hardline separatist, a passionate federalist and is again a separatist. Tomorrow, who knows? After all, this is a man who once stood before the Empire Club in Toronto and said: “God bless Canada.”

Consider courage:

Koivu has battled through a life-threatening cancer and a career-threatening eye injury and remains one of the best players in the game.

Bertrand’s greatest risk may be spending too much time in the sun perfecting his tan.

Consider contributions to international understanding:

Koivu helps promote peace and understanding as a member of the International Olympic Committee’s athletes commission.

Bertrand defended (unsuccessfully) Rwandan hate-mongerer Léon Mugesera and, in the process, was censured for making anti-Israeli statements.

Consider philanthropy:

Koivu has raised millions of dollars for medical diagnostic equipment and cancer research through his foundation and he regularly visits hospitals and offers support to cancer patients.
There’s no record of a Fondation Guy Bertrand.

And finally let’s consider leadership and success:

Koivu has won a gold medal at the world championships; three Olympic medals; two silver medals at the World Cup and has been the highly respected captain of both the Canadiens and the Finnish national team. He’s a winner.

Bertrand helped found the Parti Québécois but was defeated when he ran for the party leadership. He’s a loser.

There might be those who feel that I don’t have a right to comment on this matter because, while I’ve never lived on West Island, I’m sure Pierre Curzi feels that I’m not un vrai Québécois.

I’d have to disagree. I’ve spent most of my adult life in Quebec and, unlike those who are vrai Québécois by accident of birth, I chose to live here.

I wish I spoke better French but I manage to make myself understood when I shop several times in Granby and Sherbrooke I’m proud of the fact that my children are fluently bilingual.

I hope that my son won’t follow his sisters to Toronto but I’m aware he occasionally feels the sting of being the English kid in his French high school and that there are those who will never accept him as a vrai Québécois. I know if he does leave, he has the tools to survive elsewhere and I find it sad that not every vrai Québécois is as fortunate.


Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.